It appears that Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> said: >8 is not needed and not justified. A mail site using 8 labels would have >troubles with the RFC 7489 version, which uses the PSL. They'd have to ask >for >PSL upgrades, right?
No, they would not. They might ask to have their pseudo-TLDs added to the PSL but there's a process for that and it is definitely not our problem. >Now, we can relax our ambition to be PSL-free and state N=max number of labels >of public suffixes used by mail. Or we could put N in an IANA registry that >can be updated by expert review. Such methods allow to have N low enough, yet >upgradable and equal for all (compliant) implementations. That is a great deal of complication for no benefit whatever. I'm with Scott, pick a number, 5, 8, whatever, and be done with it. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
