On Wednesday, June 19, 2024 10:53:59 AM EDT John R Levine wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jun 2024, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > > > There are two considerations which I think are worth being considered. > > One is that it may sound unnatural to apply the PSD policy when a > > domain within the organization is publishing a DMARC record at a level > > they consider adequate. > > > Since that does not happen, I don't see any problem to solve here. > > > > IOW, why not let the org domain be just the shortest of the organization > > domains for which a DMARC record was found? It sounds more natural. > > > In nearly every case, that is exactly what DMARC does. > > The only time something else might happen is if the domain publishes psd=n > to say to use a lower level name. > > We have discussed this in hundreds of messages over the past several > years. I do not understand why anyone would try to relitigate it now.
I agree it's fine and there's no need to make any changes. Re-litigation ad infinitum seems to be par for the course. We should stop and focus on if there's anything that needs fixing before IETF last call. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
