On 9/12/24 10:27, Alessandro Vesely wrote:


To me not much.  "provided the rfc5321.MailFrom was not altered" selects a part of forwarding.  What if it was altered?  If we want to be more explicit than implicit, we have to explain why the check likely fails in each case.


Okay, so it seems like you would prefer either Option A, no mention:

As an example of this, a bank might send only targeted messages to

account holders. Those account holders might have given their bank

addresses such as [email protected] (an address that relays

the messages to another address with a real mailbox) or

[email protected] (a role-based address that does similar

relaying for the current head of finance at the association).When

such mail is delivered to the actual recipient mailbox, it will

necessarily fail SPF checks.DKIM signatures will generally remain valid

in these relay situations.


Or Option B, have some external reference. Do you have a candidate in mind?


--S.

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to