On Sun 17/Nov/2024 23:07:37 +0100 John Levine wrote:
It appears that Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> said:
-=-=-=-=-=-
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 8:51 AM Todd Herr <todd.herr=
[email protected]> wrote:
Issue is here -
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/issues/155
I replaced the last paragraph of 7.4, Interoperability Considerations,
with the text below. The last sentence is intended to avoid people
saying let's just wait for DKIM2 which will fix everything. (I hope it
will, but I don't want to wait five years to find out.)
Five years? Wow, will IPv6 take less than that?
If DKIM2 is the only solution, we are blasted. Otherwise, please remove at
least the last sentence, the "[we failed] and there is little reason to believe
that any future methods will be more successful" one.
Thanks
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
