On Sun 17/Nov/2024 19:35:00 +0100 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 8:51 AM Todd Herr
<[email protected]> wrote:
Issue is here -
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/issues/156
This issue is still open and I don't see a pull request attached to it.
Was it resolved some other way?
IMHO, the generic steps for a DNS Tree Walk *can be amended* by making it stop
at step 2 also if the record has psd=y. In that case we must reword step 2 in
Section 4.10.2 to say that the domain where the tree walk started is the
Organizational Domain.
Note that stopping also for psd=y is the only difference between step 2 and
step 6. So, if this modification is accepted, step 5 can just say "Goto 1."
The current steps were discussed in June 2022:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/k_RLJDMDJ7Q5WSUOvtx1VbtZydo
I don't recall we considered PSDs whose subdomains are PSDs where the parent
forgot to publish psd=y. Daniel-t brought up that issue in github.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
