It appears that Daniel K. <[email protected]> said: >The top level "version" element is required by the XSD in RFC 7489, but >not everyone got the memo and only about 40% of the reports I've >received has it in the XML data. > >In an earlier release of the aggregate reporting draft, the XSD was >changed to make "version" optional.
That seems reasonable. >How is versioning supposed to work going forward? Badly, I'd say. At this point I think it makes sense to make the spec describe the reports that people actually send. Given that a lot of reporters are still sending zip rather than gzip files, which we changed over a decade ago, it seems unlikely that any changes we made now would actually happen. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
