On November 28, 2024 2:12:09 PM UTC, "Daniel K." <[email protected]> wrote:
>The wording surrounding the tree walk procedure is superficially
>inconsistent. But actually not.
>
>DMARC Policy Discovery has a bullet:
>
>* If the Author Domain has eight or fewer labels,
>  the starting point will be the immediate parent
>  domain of the Author Domain.
>
>** eight or fewer **
>
>
>But the generic Tree Walk procedure has this:
>
>3. Break the subject DNS domain name into a set of ordered
>   labels. Assign the count of labels to "x", and number
>   the labels from right to left; e.g.,
>   for "a.mail.example.com", "x" would be assigned the value
>   4, "com" would be label 1, "example" would be label 2,
>   "mail" would be label 3, and so forth.
>
>4. If x < 8, remove the left-most (highest-numbered) label
>   from the subject domain. If x >= 8, remove the left-most
>   (highest-numbered) labels from the subject domain until 7
>   labels remain. The resulting DNS domain name is the new
>   target for the next lookup.
>** x >= 8 --> eight or more **
>
>
>It puzzled me until I thought it through thoroughly.
>
>Maybe reword to avoid making other unsuspecting readers puzzled by the
>superficial inconsistency?
>
>3. Break the subject DNS domain name into a set of ordered
>   labels.  Number the labels from right to left; e.g.,
>   for "a.mail.example.com", "com" would be label 1,
>   "example" would be label 2, "mail" would be label 3,
>   and so forth.
>
>4. Remove one or more of the left-most (highest-numbered)
>   labels from the subject domain until a maximum of 7
>   labels remain. The resulting DNS domain name is the new
>   target for the next lookup.
>
>Is this better or worse, or am I just mathematically or logically
>challenged, and too slow in reading the text and figuring out there is
>actually no inconsistency?
>
>
>Btw, I just sent a PR for a few wording changes, please pull it.

It looks to me like they're technically equivalent, so I think either is fine.  
Personally, I don't see the confusion and find the proposed rewrite less clear 
(but I think I wrote the current text, or parts of it, so I would, wouldn't I).

Scott K

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to