Reviewer: Di Ma Review result: Ready This draft specifies an associated mechanism to fulfill the DMARC functionality (draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-36). What it standardizes is within the framework of DMARC, hence brings no extra extension to DNS. I think it is ready from DNS perspective.
And I have an editorial comment for the authors. In this document, “TXT resource record”, “TXT record” and “TXT” are used respectively in different places, referring to the same concept. I think they should be normalized into one item. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org
