Hi there,
On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Laura Atkins wrote:
> On 4 Dec 2024, at 13:06, G.W. Haywood <dmarc-i...@jubileegroup.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>
> > ... For DMARC to be useful everybody should have p=reject and
> > everybody else should honor it. However, there are some problems to
> > fix before getting there. ...
>
> Is there somewhere a complete, easily absorbed list of the problems?
Jim’s post from earlier this week is a good, short list of some of
the interoperability problems and why some of the fixes to those
problems don’t actually solve the issues introduced by p=reject.
Thanks, I saw that - and I'm one of those who switched from p=reject a
while back. In fact, to my surprise, my notes tell me that it was over
a year ago. I don't want to offend anyone, but please may I emphasise
*complete* and repeat the question?
--
73,
Ged.
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org
