On Mon 16/Dec/2024 20:12:43 +0100 John R Levine wrote:
That's easy. Delete that sentence and put back the language in RFC 7489
sec 7.2 that explains why it's impossible and report receivers need to
deal with it.
The language in RFC 7489 is rather lengthy:
Indeed it is but why is that a problem? It explains the situation well.
Agreed. Should it be a new 2.1.x subsection?
Since it's so long that makes sense.
Looking closer, that subsection already exists, it's 2.3. Changes in Policy
During Reporting Period. It looks the same as in RFC 7489, except that the
third possibility, "generate a report whose end time occurs when the updated
policy was detected" is omitted. It was removed in release -15 in April this
year; I cannot find a discussion about it. I'd put it back in; it is the
cleanest solution after all.
I created a pull request (with some difficulty :-/
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org
