It appears that Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> said: >Todd Herr writes: >> No consensus reached for proposed change. Closing. > >I do not think we can make standard track document which do not >properly list mandatory to implement features, and give at least some >recommendations to the optional features, and which hides the >protocol feature requirements inside very hard to parse text (where >different people have different understanding what the text is trying >to say).
I think you're in the rough here. >To make this really interoperable standard, we MUST have at least one >MUST to implement authentication method, and we need to clearly >express those requirements. That would be a seriously incompatible change to 7489, so definitely no. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
