It appears that Tero Kivinen  <kivi...@iki.fi> said:
>Todd Herr writes:
>> No consensus reached for proposed change. Closing.
>
>I do not think we can make standard track document which do not
>properly list mandatory to implement features, and give at least some
>recommendations to the optional features, and which hides the
>protocol feature requirements inside very hard to parse text (where
>different people have different understanding what the text is trying
>to say). 

I think you're in the rough here.

>To make this really interoperable standard, we MUST have at least one
>MUST to implement authentication method, and we need to clearly
>express those requirements.

That would be a seriously incompatible change to 7489, so definitely no.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to