On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 1:21 PM Daniel K. <[email protected]> wrote: [snip]
> The outer sequence group for each of the alternatives are not strictly > needed, but RFC5234, Section 3.5 "strongly advise" that they are added, > to "avoid misinterpretation by casual readers". > > I think I see why you changed it, it is unreasonable to require all > URI's in the list either having a size part or no size part. Mixed use > should be supported, as in the following updated ABNF: > > dmarc-urilist = (dmarc-uri / obs-dmarc-uri) > *(*WSP "," *WSP (dmarc-uri / obs-dmarc-uri)) > Thank you. I will open an issue and incorporate this in rev -39, which will be released in the next week. -- Todd Herr Some Guy in VA LLC [email protected] 703-220-4153 Book Time With Me: https://calendar.app.google/tGDuDzbThBdTp3Wx8
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
