RE: Aggregate, I was hoping to get the PR from Daniel K merged with the changes to the prose section before scheduling. If you feel it can be scheduled as it’s a reformatting of the same information, I’ll defer to you. I’m not aware of any other large issues to contend with.
-- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast From: Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2025 4:39 PM To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org> Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Re: IESG evaluation schedule There are now four formal telechats remaining before IETF 122 at which documents get reviewed and approved: 1/23 has room for nine more pages, so it's basically full. 2/6 has room for three more pages, but DMARCbis is already there. 2/20 has room for 317 pages left. 3/6 is currently empty. When do we want to call the aggregate reporting document done enough for me to schedule it? What do we think about the post-LC discussions about the base document? Are we making any changes big enough to mess with the Last Call result? Significant post-LC changes were a problem just now for EMAILCORE so I'd like to avoid that here. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org
