On 1/13/25 18:15, John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Daniel K.  <dan...@vendo.no> said:
>> Several possible layouts for the tables were discussed throughout the
>> development of this series. None of the alternatives got huge support
>>from anyone, so in the end I went for my preferred layout with the '#'
>> title leaving more room for the description column. ...
> 
> Remember that the RPC does the formatting of the published document
> and they have way more experience of this stuff than any of us do.
> 
> I'd suggest leaving what you have and put a note in the XML saying
> that you tried other formats and can send them samples if they want.

I can suggest this for Alex, and to put it in 2.1.1:

RFC EDITOR: We explored several variations of the table layout, and
ended up with with what can be seen below, the most compact alternative.
Other variations can be seen here: https://ietf.vendo.no/


Daniel K.

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to