On 1/13/25 18:15, John Levine wrote: > It appears that Daniel K. <dan...@vendo.no> said: >> Several possible layouts for the tables were discussed throughout the >> development of this series. None of the alternatives got huge support >>from anyone, so in the end I went for my preferred layout with the '#' >> title leaving more room for the description column. ... > > Remember that the RPC does the formatting of the published document > and they have way more experience of this stuff than any of us do. > > I'd suggest leaving what you have and put a note in the XML saying > that you tried other formats and can send them samples if they want.
I can suggest this for Alex, and to put it in 2.1.1: RFC EDITOR: We explored several variations of the table layout, and ended up with with what can be seen below, the most compact alternative. Other variations can be seen here: https://ietf.vendo.no/ Daniel K. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org