It seems like the only true outstanding issue is the thread from the PRs from Ale. They’re minor points I believe. I would think we’re safe to schedule it?
-- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast From: Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2025 10:18 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-25.txt Hi, On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 6:19 PM <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-25.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (DMARC) WG of the IETF. Title: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) Aggregate Reporting Author: Alex Brotman Name: draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-25.txt Pages: 36 Dates: 2025-01-12 Abstract: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) allows for Domain Owners to request aggregate reports from receivers. This report is an XML document, and contains extensible elements that allow for other types of data to be specified later. The aggregate reports can be submitted to the Domain Owner's specified destination as supported by the receiver. Please make a decision ASAP regarding whether you want this one to go to the IESG now or you want to keep debating it. This document is 36 pages, and the current pre-122 telechat story is: January 23: 9 pages left, so it won't fit here February 6: over-full by 5 pages (but dmarcbis is here) February 20: 267 pages left March 6: currently empty ... and we just heard that there are multiple other large documents now competing for the space remaining. Outgoing ADs' documents have priority, but I wouldn't rely on that forever. We need to get this scheduled. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
