Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-28: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for addressing my previous DISCUSS point (I told you that it was super easy to fix) ## COMMENTS (non-blocking) ### Abstract It is unclear to me what is meant by `as supported by the receiver`. s/replaces [RFC7489]/obsoletes and replaces [RFC7489]/ ### Section 1 Suggest repeating the expansion for "DMARC". s/to request that receivers/to request that e-mail receivers/ ? (see further) ### Section 2 Suggest to be consistent in the naming "Mail Receivers" (to be preferred) or "mail receivers" or "receivers". ### Section 2.1.1.8 What is a `The connecting IP`? I only know about "The connecting IP address" also valid for s/source_ip/source_ip_address/ (probably too late to change the element name). ### Section 2.1.1.10 Where is "RFC5322.From" defined ? I can guess it of course, but let's be accurate. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
