On 3/4/25 13:38, Orie wrote: > Based on your changes, I now understand the word remaining to refer to > URIs that are not malformed. > > If that's correct, then I'm fine with these proposed changes.
History of 'remaining' is that there used to be an introductory sentence about removing URIs that specified a lower size limit than the size of the report to be sent, and 'remaining' used to refer to what was left after the culling. This size limitation syntax has been obsoleted. With this update, specifying to ignore malformed URIs, 'remaining' becomes meaningful again. Personally I don't think we need to specify to not send to malformed destinations, and just remove the word 'remaining' instead, but either way works, of course. Anyway, this whole thing reminded me of a previous message regarding dmarcbis. Dmarcbis authors; please see this email from the archives, about text that should probably copy the text from the paragraph discussed above. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/veSwFXLs9PplmaH_RWfj9olsf4Y/ Daniel K. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
