On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 10:26 AM Alessandro Vesely <ves...@tana.it> wrote:
> On Wed 11/Jun/2025 13:56:50 +0200 John R Levine wrote: > > > > I really do not understand what point you are making here. People find > > aggregate reports useful enough to build businesses around them. But > failure > > reports are useless. > > > I can hardly believe it. Unless you're getting a reward for receiving > useless messages, why on earth do you have this record? > > "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmar...@abuse.net; ruf=mailto: > dmar...@abuse.net; psd=n;" > > If ruf= indicates something, I looked at the records of DNSWL subscribers: > > /var/lib/rbldns/domain.list: 23488 records > 16945 DMARC records (72.00%) > 13154 rua (56.00%) > 8622 ruf (36.00%) > > > That seems to indicate that failure reports are less popular than > aggregate ones, but a number of domains want them. > > Best > Ale > -- Ale, can you show the top 10 or 20 domains (and number of domains pointing to them) receiving the RUF reports? I have a feeling it skews towards intermediaries such as Agari, Valimail and Dmarcian. TIA Michael Hammer
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org
