On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at 3:05 PM John R Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2025, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > >> B. Unless my collection of failure reports is very unusual, basically > >> nobody sends failure reports now, at least not without a private > agreement > >> to deal with the PII issues. If you set up a new domain and publish an > ruf= > >> tag, you're not going to get reports and it would be a cruel joke to > tell > >> people otherwise. > > > > False, up to a definition of "basically". > > I have data, but whatever. As I said, whatever drives a stake through its > hard the soonest. > > Is someone who thinks failure reports are useful prepared to update the > drafts to keep them in the main document? If not, I'll update it to take > them out I'm willing to work with others to update the RUF draft to keep it in. I propose that we go through it section by section. It is important that we stay within the scope of the recharter and avoid scope creep.Hopefully we will show progress by the time of the IETF DMARC meeting. Michael Hammer
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org
