On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 3:43 PM Dotzero <dotz...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> I've been thinking about the potential problem space you describe, Todd.
> The question in my mind is whether the problem is the size of a slice of
> bread, a loaf of bread or  the size of a bread truck. My experience
> inclines me to believe this is not even a slice of bread. Ale points out in
> many cases the account may not exist. Much of the mail involved is spam.
> For the most part, when it involves a real recipient we are talking email
> address and possibly name. How frequently do legitimate individuals or
> organizations send email using a domain that is not their own? Very rarely.
> I just don't see this issue at a scope or scale that even makes it a
> rounding error.
>
>
I'm dubious about the claim that a DMARC failure report would be generated
in response to an email sent to a non-existent address; I would expect such
messages to be rejected at RCPT TO, with no opportunity for the receiving
domain to even evaluate DMARC at that point, let alone generate a failure
report, because there'd be no DATA command and no RFC5322.From header
transmitted.



> The problem is with someone sending mail from a domain they don't have
> permission to use.
>
>
Respectfully, the problem is with someone sending mail from a domain they
don't have permission to use to an address that the domain owner (i.e., the
report consumer) may or may not have knowledge of, but for the sake of
argument, let's limit the problem description to just unauthorized use of a
domain, regardless of the recipient address...

What value is there in sharing the recipient's address with the domain
owner, then? The message didn't transit the domain owner's servers, and so
the recipient address is worthless for using as a key to search logs for
the problem message, so why bother reporting it?

-- 
Todd Herr
Some Guy in VA LLC
t...@someguyinva.com
703-220-4153
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to