On Tue 04/Nov/2025 19:29:35 +0100 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 1:26 PM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote:
The points I quote below below seem to depend on an interpretation of fo=,
which took me quite quite a while to understand.
That's not a good sign ...
At times I'm pretty slow :-/
My concern isn't you; if the author doesn't understand it, what chance does
anyone else have?
After I understood it, I tried to make it clear. That was rev. -16, when I
rewrote Section 3. Yet, I'm not sure it's clear enough.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
