On Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 3:08 PM Sean Whalen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > I'm the maintainer and original developer of the CheckDMARC and ParseDMARC > tools, but this is my first time being active with anything IETF, so please > let me know if there is a better place to address this. While reading > draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-41, > I noticed that section C.7. Report Generator Recommendations says: > > This document in Section 4.6 says: > > A report **SHOULD** be sent to each listed URI provided in the DMARC > Policy Record. > > > However, section 4.6. DMARC Reporting URIs only says: > > [RFC3986] defines a syntax for identifying a resource. The DMARC mechanism > uses this as the format by which a Domain Owner or PSO specifies the > destination(s) for the two report types that are supported. The DMARC > Policy Record format allows for a list of these URIs to be provided, with > each URI separated by commas (ASCII 0x2c). > > A formal definition is provided in Section 4.8. > > Hi Sean. The document in question has long since been submitted to the RFC Editors at the IETF. If they don't catch this as part of their work prior to final publication, then it'll fall to the RFC Errata process after the document has been published - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rpc-errata-process/ -- Todd
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
