Ok, I see the misunderstanding now. The original test case in bugzilla
compiles and works fine. You added a different test case which
fails in a different way.
Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Hi,
sorry for causing confusion, but it still won't compile here. Getting a
fresh copy from the repository showed no difference in the source code.
I've also tried going back to revision 324 with the original patch,
still an error. qtd compiled a week ago, so I'm completely confused.
Do you see a flaw in the analysis in bugzilla #3674? Maybe discussion
should be done there...
Rainer
Walter Bright wrote:
I tried it again, it still works. All I can
suggest is you are working from a different set of dmd sources than I
am.
Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Hi,
I just tried again, rebuilt dmd after clean, but the error persists
(though it's different from the one reported in the bugzilla entry
#3674). I have added a detailed description to the entry.
I think this has crawled into dmd with changes to the Type::covariant()
function, but I have no clue why it didn't show up earlier (and why you
don't see it).
Rainer
Walter Bright wrote:
I just tried it, and it works.
Rainer Schuetze wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to drop a note that there seems to be regression with the
latest changes committed to subversion. It seems to be related to #3674
(the test-case fails), but I have no clue yet what's been causing this.
I will try to figure out what's going on tonight.
Rainer
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
|
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
