On 17/03/10 03:00, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 03/15/2010 11:29 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Brad Roberts wrote:
On 3/15/2010 9:07 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Trass3r wrote:
Third issue:
Somebody messed up std.perf. Doesn't measure anything anymore.
That would be me. I failed to spot the difference between _qpc and
_qtc
and thought I'd "optimize" the code. Thanks for setting the code
straight.
Such variable names are overly optimized. They fail to convey meaning.
Generally, it's a bad idea to have two variable names in the same scope
that differ only in an inner letter. Letters at the beginning or end
should be different. Humans often just don't see the inner letter
differences.
That's a hoax perpetrated by a chain mail with cherry picked words.
Did you ever have trouble figuring "funk" out?
Andrei
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
I tihnk you are crorcet. Tehse mdlide ltetres are vrey ipmornatt!
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
