OK, then the unit test is wrong :) -Steve
----- Original Message ---- > From: Sean Kelly <[email protected]> It's a matter of > preference, I suppose. I like requiring operations like this to be > matched, so it's invalid to call disable() twice and enable() three times. > To me, this indicates a logic error in the > code. _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing > list > href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
