OK, then the unit test is wrong :)

-Steve



----- Original Message ----
> From: Sean Kelly <[email protected]>

It's a matter of 
> preference, I suppose.  I like requiring operations like this to be 
> matched, so it's invalid to call disable() twice and enable() three times.  
> To me, this indicates a logic error in the 
> code.
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing 
> list

> href="mailto:[email protected]";>[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta


      
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta

Reply via email to