On Mon, 9 Aug 2010, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > On Monday, August 09, 2010 16:52:42 Brad Roberts wrote: > > I object to the use of "can't" though. :) > > Well, if you assume that it has been decided that the release will go out > within > a certain time frame and that fixing the bug would take longer than that time > frame, "can't" would indeed be correct. However, what you're probably looking > for is something more along the lines of > > "Given everything else that's on my plate which has higher priority and the > fact > that I'm going to take care of the higher priority issues first, I can't fix > this > bug in the time that I have prior to the release." > > That's a lot more verbose though. > > - Jonathan M Davis
It's that I know that the release points are essentially completely arbitrary most of the time and that pushing it back a day or two is almost always a non-issue, other than just the desire to call it done and move onto the next cycle. But if there's really a timing issue, then sure. _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
