Whoa.. who's calling any of d2 production ready? On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Walter Bright wrote:
> I agree that we can't keep yanking stuff with no warning and yet call Phobos2 > production ready. > > David Simcha wrote: > > Speaking of sortedRange, I think we need to put lowerBound, upperBound and > > canFindSorted back in std.algorithm, but make them scheduled for > > deprecation. I was actually using these and a bunch of my code broke. > > In general, I don't think we need to be anal about backwards compatibility > > in Phobos yet, but I think that when things are removed they should always > > be scheduled for deprecation for a few releases, then deprecated for a few > > releases, never removed without any warning whatsoever. > > > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Rainer Schuetze <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > I've hit a bad assertion in the new std.range.SortedRange: > > > > immutable size_t msb = bsr(this._input.length) + 1; > > assert(msb > 0 && msb < this._input.length); > > > > fails for length 2. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > dmd-beta mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta > _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
