I'll take care of that.
Sent by shouting through my showerhead.
On Feb 10, 2011, at 11:40 PM, Jonathan M Davis <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Thursday, February 10, 2011 13:55:26 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/10/11 3:20 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Thursday 10 February 2011 12:48:07 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Doesn't version(StdDdoc) take care of this as discussed?
I don't know. I've never heard of version(StdDdoc) that I recall. I
thought that the issue was that we had to pick a version to use
instead
of version(D_Ddoc) (which could be StdDdoc) and then adjust the
makefiles appropriately. So, unless the makefiles have already been
adjusted, I don't see how version(StdDdoc) could work. Or maybe I'm
missing or misunderstanding something here.
That is it. The makefile has not been adjusted but that's minor work.
We'd essentially be getting back to our previous approach to
generating
documentation.
Well, then I suggest that we adjust the makefiles relatively soon
(before the
next release certainly) for both druntime and phobos. And you're
probably the
man for the job in this case. You're the one dealing with the
documentation on
the website, and presumably you have a fair idea of what to do.
I'm perfectly willing to go and fix std.datetime and elsewhere to use
version(StdDoc), but I don't want to be the one to edit the
makefiles (though a
search and replace on version(D_Ddoc) would be easy enough, so
fixing the source
files isn't hard).
- Jonathan M Davis
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
