On 7/6/2011 12:08 PM, David Simcha wrote:
Again, where does this leave the weakly pure function issue? I want to be sure that weak purity for non-const member functions is going away forever before I take it out of all my code and test this beta in any detail.
The trouble was that there were a lot of functions marked as 'pure' that were changing things pointed to by its arguments.
I understand that within a pure function, such a pure function could modify locals without the caller becoming impure. But those functions are still impure.
_______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
