I found another problem, that i think that was not present in the last
release:
string mutateTheImmutable(immutable string _s)
{
char[] s = _s.dup;
foreach(ref c; s)
c = 'x';
return s.idup;
}
string doharm(immutable string _name)
{
return mutateTheImmutable(_name[2..$].idup);
}
enum literal = "CL_INVALID_CONTEXT";
pragma(msg, "literal:" ~ literal);
enum foo = doharm(literal);
pragma(msg, "mutated:" ~ foo);
pragma(msg, "literal:" ~ literal);
void main(){}
dmd messages:
literal:CL_INVALID_CONTEXT
mutated:xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
literal:CLxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Is this behaviour by design ??
On 08.07.2011 00:50, David Simcha wrote:
I Isolated the other regression that I mentioned this morning. It's
one that I don't think anyone else is likely to run into and I
wouldn't be at all annoyed if we just released with it.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6267
On 7/5/2011 10:31 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd1beta.zip
http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
