On 24 October 2011 23:01, Brad Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > And then there was one.. just: > > http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6681 which is only a regression for D1, not for D2. > > Almost to the point of a 0 regression release. Hopefully the start of a > very important and wonderful trend.
I think that the number of regressions introduced in release RRR or greater is a far more important metric than the numbers of regressions reported since DDD. The crucial value of RRR for D2 is 2.048, since 2.047 coincided with the release of TDPL. Compared to previous releases, we're doing much better in that respect too: 6177 Regression(2.053): ICE backend/cgcs.c: struct with destructor in assoc. array or typesafe variadic functions http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6177 6278 Regression(2.054): 'in' contract inheritance doesn't work with safe code 6398 Regression(2.054): Property getter/setter confusion 6329 (2.054, Windows only) Out of range exceptions not thrown in certain cases 5533 Regression(2.051, Linux only): segv: -gc, associative arrays, const pointers to self There are a couple of Phobos regressions: 5876 std.container doesn't work with delegates 5718 Can't demangle symbol defined inside unittest block one druntime regression 6088 Stack trace or some info with stack overflow and one packaging regression 6406 [2.054] Libraries not working on Ubuntu _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
