Sorry for the ridiculous number of messages. I keep thinking I'm going to go do something other than work on this bug, and then having new insights. I've figured out that the SciD issues are definitely NOT issues with 2.057. SciD was actually inadvertently relying on a bug that got FIXED. I'm go for a release.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:45 AM, David Simcha <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/8/2011 1:14 AM, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > >> From: "David Simcha" <[email protected]> >> >>> On 12/7/2011 4:56 AM, Walter Bright wrote: >>> >>>> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/**dmd2beta.zip<http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip> >>>> ______________________________**_________________ >>>> dmd-beta mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.puremagic.com/**mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta<http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta> >>>> >>>> The issue I was having getting SciD to build is, of course, gone, but >>> now I have a new one. I'm not sure if it's a latent bug in SciD or a DMD >>> regression, but I've got DustMite chugging away on it. I learned my lesson >>> last night: DustMite actually isn't hard to use and you don't want to >>> hand-reduce SciD because you'll be chasing long chains of template >>> instantiations. >>> >> >> Yup, DustMite is fantastic. It deserves to be a headling feature of D. It >> does sound intimidating at first, but then you read the docs and find it's >> dead simple to use. >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> dmd-beta mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.puremagic.com/**mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta<http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta> >> >> > On looking at this further, I can see how it worked in the first place. > Dustmite dropped the ball because it reproduced the error, but for the > wrong reason. Maybe it is a regression. I'll try harder to reproduce it > tonight. >
_______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
