OK,
Gets past that part, but it still fails in a spot where I think it should
pass. example code:
inout(int[]) foo(inout(int)[] x)
{
return x;
}
Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (x) of type inout(int)[] to
inout(int[])
Since I can convert immutable(int)[] to immutable(int[]), I should be able to
do the same with inout.
-Steve
----- Original Message -----
> From: kenji hara <[email protected]>
> To: Steve Schveighoffer <[email protected]>; Discuss the dmd beta releases
> for D <[email protected]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2011 5:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [dmd-beta] Last D beta 1.072 and 2.057
>
> Posted.
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/550
>
> Kenji Hara
>
> 2011/12/9 kenji hara <[email protected]>:
>> Ouch! It is a regression caused by fix for issue 6912.
>> Now I'm testing a patch to fix it. Please wait a moment.
>>
>> Kenji Hara
>>
>> 2011/12/9 Steve Schveighoffer <[email protected]>:
>>> crap, this breaks dcollections. Not sure how this regression happened:
>>>
>>> inout(int[]) foo(inout(int[]) x)
>>> {
>>> const y = x;
>>> return x;
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> Error: cannot implicitly convert expression (x) of type inout(int[]) to
> const(int[])
>>>
>>> inout should implicitly convert to const. Kenji?
>>>
>>> Sorry for the late entry...
>>>
>>> -Steve
>
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
