On 1/29/12 10:29 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu<[email protected]> wrote:
We started at 25 regressions, 18 blockers, 45 critical, and 158 major bugs
out of 2751 open issues.
Now we have 2541 issues, of which 29 regressions, 15 blockers, and 49
criticals, and 147 majors.
Great job on the bug scrubbing and picking the low-hanging fruit (210!) but
unfortunately we haven't significantly reduced the age of the oldest bug,
and we have a net increase of regressions and criticals. I'd say we should
make significant progress on these three items before considering a beta.
With the exception of the regressions, I disagree.
More critical bugs reported does not mean a decrease in quality, just
that more people are using D.
Well, it means we don't know until we measure or collect evidence. At
this point you are stating a hypothesis.
I just listed everything changed on or after 2011-12-14
(http://goo.gl/QYdpA) with critical/blocker/major and indeed the list is
pretty good with 51 items. (Unfortunately I don't know how to list only
items that were open before that date.) But having a net decrease or at
least some sort of dynamic equilibrium in high-importance bugs would
indicate we have control over such.
Andrei
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
