Yeah. Now that you point this out, I agree 100%. Feel free to close the relevant bug report as invalid.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Don Clugston <[email protected]>wrote: > On 8 February 2012 16:31, David Simcha <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok, I think I understand where you're coming from. The intended use for > > this was to add member functions depending on the result of the static > if, > > not member variables. Adding member functions should in theory be legal, > > but figuring out whether an instantiation could add member functions is > > non-trivial and I think equivalent to the Halting Problem. > > I mean X.tupleof shouldn't be defined, if X is not fully defined yet. > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Don Clugston <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> I don't think that should compile. If there was anything inside the > >> 'static if' body, it'd be wrong code. > >> To me, that looks like an accepts-invalid bug that's been fixed. > >> > >> On 8 February 2012 14:56, David Simcha <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > On 2/8/2012 5:50 AM, Walter Bright wrote: > >> >> > >> >> http://ftp.digitalmars.com/dmd2beta.zip > >> >> > >> >> I'm calling it an alpha because we haven't resolved the associative > >> >> array > >> >> issue. But I want to see if there are any others before we do a > >> >> release. > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> dmd-beta mailing list > >> >> [email protected] > >> >> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta > >> >> > >> > > >> > Bug 7426 is still broken in cases that worked in 2.057. > >> > > >> > struct S { > >> > static if(hasIndirections!(typeof(this))) {} > >> > } > >> > > >> > template hasIndirections(T) > >> > { > >> > enum hasIndirections = > hasIndirectionsImpl!(typeof(T.init.tupleof)); > >> > } > >> > > >> > template hasIndirectionsImpl(T...) > >> > { > >> > static if (!T.length) > >> > { > >> > enum hasIndirectionsImpl = false; > >> > } > >> > else > >> > { > >> > enum hasIndirectionsImpl = true; > >> > > >> > } > >> > } > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > dmd-beta mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta > >> _______________________________________________ > >> dmd-beta mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dmd-beta mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta > _______________________________________________ > dmd-beta mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta >
_______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
