Yes, this is ambiguous.
Andrei
On 2/10/12 12:05 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
This compiles for me without error. When it runs, I get a stack
overflow.
The reason looks clear - foo(Args) is recursively calling itself. I
don't
think it's a bug in dmd.
I retried above code using new beta on two environments.
Mac OS X 10.6.8 causes segmentation fault, but
Scientific Linux release 6.0 64bit works fine.
Does D allow above code?
If I understand that correctly then the chosen overload differs.
This prints "variadic" for me. Can you recheck this for other setups
and file a bug.
IMHO this should be an ambiguous overload error.
-----
import std.stdio;
struct S
{
void foo(V)(in V v)
{
writeln("non-variadic");
}
void foo(Args...)(auto ref const Args args)
{
writeln("variadic");
}
}
void main()
{
S s;
s.foo(10);
}
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
