On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 22:00:45 Walter Bright wrote: > On 4/10/2012 9:52 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote: > > Are you intending to implement this for 2.059 or wait for 2.060? It would > > certainly mitigate the issues that we've been having with opEquals and > > opCmp, but it would obviously delay the release a bit. - Jonathan M Davis > I'm planning on doing it for 2.059. If we wait, then we pointlessly force > people to rewrite their code.
It's fine with me. I was just looking to find out what the plan was. opEquals and opCmp for structs have always been a little iffy due to const ref, and this release would probably make that situation worse as it stands. This proposal appears to make it _much_ better (assuming that no one can find any major problems with it). - Jonathan M Davis _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
