Jonathan M Davis, el 16 de August a las 13:29 me escribiste: > On Thursday, August 16, 2012 13:09:56 Nick Sabalausky wrote: > > No spam, no heuristic bullshit, no false positives. So yes, it > > *IS* possible, and not at all difficult. You'd be surprised just how > > few leaks there really are to email harvesters. Most systems are > > surprisingly resistent to leaking out addresses. Just not public > > mailing lists. > > In my experience, the primary source of spam is from mailing lists with leaks > via friends accounts knowing my address being another. I don't generally get > spam from addresses I use with stores. Most of my e-mail accounts have very > little spam, and if I were getting enough spam, I'd seriously consider getting > a new account. But even the spam from the mailing list is low enough that it's > not all that big an issue (and I _never_ use spam filters without still > looking > at every e-mail to verify that it's spam - I just can't trust that it's going > to be smart enough never to throw away something that I care about).
Well, I use bogofilter and is not smart at all (is bayesian) but is extremely effective. I used to check the spam folder, but at some point I stopped because there's been ages since the last false positive. But bogofilter have an intermediate status "unsure". I get about 25 spam e-mails per day and only about 1 goes to the unsure folder, and I would say only 1/4 of the unsure e-mail is not spam. -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Que el viento y la lluvia sean dos hermanos y corran furiosos por los terraplenes de Víctor Heredia. -- Ricardo Vaporeso. Lanús, 1912. _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
