> You kind of propose that "const int" to be a completely different type > depending on initialiser. It is horrible. >
I have not said that. I've asserted that const member with an initializer, when inside a struct, is ALWAYS a bug. I agree that we need to get rid of the existing behaviour. But I argue it should simply be an error, rather than replacing it with a misfeature.
_______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
