On Wed, 29 May 2013 00:44:08 +0200 Andrej Mitrovic <[email protected]> wrote: > > And I'm unhappy that I'm forced to mention about the broken > documentation for every single release, this whole process should have > been automated years ago. > > But let's bury the hatchets. I think Nick mentioned it would be a good > idea to have a D script of some sorts that would build the .zip > release. If we had that, I suppose we could also have a test-case for > the script itself to make sure we always have fresh documentation and > the newest builds of all tools (e.g. the RDMD.exe in the zip file is > time-stamped for 2 weeks ago). >
FWIW, I am actually working on automating as much as I can. I'm starting with a minimal DMD bootstrapper (well, two really: one for Win and one for Posix) so that, hopefully, all of our other tools can safely rely on D being available. Hopefully, I can have it all done in time for 2.064. We'll see. Speaking of bootstrapping D (as this could impact what I'm doing as well), there's been talk about parts of DMD being rewritten in D. Where are we on that? _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
