On 11/7/2013 5:30 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 11/07/2013 09:43 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 11/05/2013 02:18 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
All I did was run the installer scripts (on github) to build the rpm
packages. Are those scripts wrong?
No, the scripts are OK, but the libphobo2.so build on Debian (or Ubuntu)
doesn't work on Fedora or openSuse.
As we couldn't agree to workaround this issue I proposed to build working rpm
packages.
I rebuild and tested the rpms with a replaced libphobos2.so.
86fc8d8ac5d807c83c9235b86fdb2b10
http://dlang.dawg.eu/download/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.i386.rpm
999752c341577e6b59410422df707165
http://dlang.dawg.eu/download/dmd-2.064.2-0.fedora.x86_64.rpm
d7421b9c66e9ccf74c41b676f1f6899f
http://dlang.dawg.eu/download/dmd-2.064.2-0.openSUSE.i386.rpm
b39e10c939fd005c89f849b2263a19e0
http://dlang.dawg.eu/download/dmd-2.064.2-0.openSUSE.x86_64.rpm
call them .3 ? And what exactly is different about them? Should I cherry-pick a
pull first?
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
