On 1/10/2014 1:31 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On Jan 10, 2014, at 01:24 AM, Walter Bright <[email protected]> wrote:
Rather than trying to fix the 2.065 branch, perhaps we should simply abandon it
and go with 2.066?
Absolutely not. We already have a very confusing release process, don't making
more confusing by skipping version numbers.
I don't see what's confusing about it. Numbers don't have to be sequential, they
only have to be increasing.
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
