The branches need to be cleaned up to make this release anyway. I don't see how calling it 2.066 would make doing this any easier.
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Walter Bright <[email protected]>wrote: > > On 1/12/2014 9:48 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote: > >> I am strongly against skipping 2.065. >> > > Why? > > > Just fix it and release it. >> >> > It's a lot more work than to do a 2.066, which means it needs > justification. > > _______________________________________________ > dmd-beta mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta >
_______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
