El 21/02/14 03:01, Leandro Lucarella ha escrit: > I think this doesn't make sense. Providing dependencies is something > each software distributor should do. Either you go through the package > system (in which case this .deb is not needed) or you take care of > providing an all-in-one bundle as provided by the direct download dmd > package. I really don't see the point on providing a libphobos2 package > outside a proper apt repository.
It has the same sense that providing all-in-one dmd deb package. Without adding a new repository, allows to install the libphobos2 shared library, necessary on runtime if compiled against it. It has all sense for me. -- Jordi Sayol _______________________________________________ dmd-beta mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
