As always, the best and most appropriate way to make sure something isn't lost (and comments at the
end of a closed pull request definitely fall into the likely to be lost category) is to file a bug
report.
On 7/8/14, 4:39 AM, Steven Schveighoffer via dmd-beta wrote:
Just to bring this up again, this still is not fixed.
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3711#issuecomment-48325105
-Steve
On Jun 26, 2014, at 10:49 PM, Steven Schveighoffer via dmd-beta
<[email protected]> wrote:
We cannot release without either reverting the changes to AA requirements, or
making it so we are sure code that was flawed, but previously worked, is
flagged as an error.
See this comment:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3599#issuecomment-45275443
Code that previously (incorrectly) relies on the fact that AA code only calls
compare, and defines only opCmp and not opEquals, will SILENTLY BREAK if we
release today.
This is not acceptable. It needs to break, but break loudly, and not compile.
-Steve
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
_______________________________________________
dmd-beta mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-beta
