On Apr 28, 2010, at 12:21 PM, Benjamin Shropshire <[email protected]
> wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Simply running all tests is necessary but not sufficient. After
running hundreds of thousands of tests, there needs to be any easy
way to figure out which tests failed and review their failure.
BTW, that should have been hundreds _or_ thousands. I haven't been in
a group with more than 10,000 tests.
maybe there should be an implicit line added ate the top of all
unittests:
scope(failure) writefln("unittest at %s:%d failed",
__FILE__,__LINE__);
I would hope that any implicit mixin would reference an overridable
druntime function. Summarizing failures by pure count or by user-
defined category is very common.
Bonus points for an implicit mixin that permits a variable argument
count and curries unit test arguments to it. The biggest thing I'd
want is a unit test name. An optional category name would be next on
my wish list.
_______________________________________________
dmd-internals mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
