On 20/06/10 20:32, Brad Roberts wrote: > On 6/20/2010 4:51 AM, Robert Clipsham wrote: >> On 20/06/10 11:22, dsource.org wrote: >>> dmd commit, revision 551 >>> >>> >>> user: braddr >>> >>> msg: >>> another group of tests >>> >>> http://www.dsource.org/projects/dmd/changeset/551 >> >> Shouldn't these tests really be moved to a separate repository? dmd-test >> or something? That way other people can get access rights and it doesn't >> clutter up my RSS feed with commits I couldn't care less about... I >> subscribed to the dmd feed not the dmd test quite feed. While it's nice >> that there's now an official public test suite (long overdue I might >> add), I'd rather not have to spend my time reading through the commits >> for it. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Robert > > I completely disagree (which is probably obvious because I put them where I did > on purpose). The tests for the app belong with the app. > > Once the tests are populated from the existing tests, the submits will have more > relevance because they'll be coupled with code changes. Thus it'll actually be > even easier to tell what a code change is about. > > Later, > Brad
This is what svn imports are for - http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.0/re12.html . The tests can stay in a separate repo, but are automatically included when you check out dmd. PS: Sorry if this came out as a top post, someone has made gmane unidirectional, so I have no idea how to use the mailing lists properly now :3 -- Robert http://octarineparrot.com/
_______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
