I'm manually approving github users before testing their pull requests. Hopefully this will be enough.
On a side note, does anybody have any idea what's behind the phobos test failure? On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 7:28 AM, Brad Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > Good stuff. Thanks for doing this. Are you doing anything to protect > yourself against malicious pulls? Anyone > anywhere can submit a pull request for any code whatsoever. Not super likely > to happen, but it certainly could. > > Later, > Brad > > On 9/2/2011 11:29 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote: >> Now available at http://yebblies.com/results/ >> >> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Daniel Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I've been working on an automated tester for dmd pull requests, and >>> here are the results (after running for 12 hours) >>> I've been running these on ubuntu, and I have no idea why the >>> std.datetime unittests are always failing, but at least it's >>> consistent. >>> Any pulls which rely on other pulls, naturally won't work. >>> Some of these results may already be out of date. > > _______________________________________________ > dmd-internals mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals > _______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
