The former now, then the latter after the release. It's not just a matter of moving the code into object.d (object.di actually, we need a way too fix the duplication as well) For the transition to really work, the way AAs are handled in the frontend needs to be redone so that the glue layer, the backend, and the interpreter can completely forget they exist.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Brad Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > Meaning return to before there was an AA type in object.d or complete the > transition to just the object.d version (which > would include moving the code hidden off in the runtime into either object.d > or a file imported publically by object.d)? > > I'd prefer the latter. > _______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
