On 5/29/2012 12:02 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On May 29, 2012, at 03:12 AM, Brad Roberts <[email protected]> wrote:
Fully agree, but we are within reach of 0 open regressions, so let's close
that gap now and keep it there. The longer
we wait the easier it is to wait just a little more. If that's not practical
for this release (and I'm not accepting
that premise), can we commit NOW that the next release will be at 0 open
regression bugs as a release criteria?
I agree. We really don't have an official road map or release schedule so I
don't see any problem with waiting with the release until the regressions are
fixed.
The issue would be with people who are blocked waiting for things that are
already fixed in 2.060.
_______________________________________________
dmd-internals mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
